|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 69 post(s) |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1111
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 16:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Goliath, who is your goon main?
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1111
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 16:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:CCP! Jade Constantine meta gamed us. Meta gamed the Goons!! *sniff* I want this fixed right now!!!!!!!!! *sniff*
By the way any word on when you will process my job application?
In all seriousness CCP, you just made the war dec system 100% in favor of large alliances picking on small ones and leaving no options for the small ones. I truly hope you fix this. I find it pretty much impossible that you did not see the large alliance vs very small alliance scenario happening.
I mean ****, why don't you just add this in your patch notes:
- Gave Goonswarm Federation a Sabre BPO so they would get over it already
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1111
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 17:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Two step wrote:Come on Jade, being able to lock allies into mutual wars is clearly a really bad idea. Right now, I could form two alt corps, have them wardec each other, and then grab a bunch of free allies or even paid mercs, make the war mutual and never let them out. This is a bad thing, and these changes go a long way towards fixing that problem.
Limits on allies are not just about Goons, why would *any* corp wardec anyone else right now? If you do so, you are subjecting yourself to a possibly unlimtied number of allies. You talk about 9000 vs 100, but what about a 20 vs 20 wardec. Right now, the defender can pull in many hundreds or even thousands of allies, and there is no way a small corp would be able to deal with that.
And yet CCP took the one fix that caters solely to large alliances instead of a real fix. Care to explain that Mr. CSM guy?
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1114
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 18:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
*snip*
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1115
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 19:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote:what exactly does goonswarm have to lose by being in a highsec war with anyone
answer: nothing, because we've been using neutral alts in empire since 2006
Oh, so the last six years of Privaters and Orphanage killing thousands of you in high sec are all fake kill mails?
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1115
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 20:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
CCP Goliath wrote:Guys, before this goes on any further, kindly take off the hats and get real - we do not develop with one corp or alliance in mind... Players will always look at extremes when it comes to game mechanics. When I say extremes I am referring to scenarios. Because the war dec mechanic is based off member count; one extreme is the one man corp, the other will be the current largest alliance. That current one is Goonswarm Federation. If they did not exist it would be TEST. If not them, then xxxRMTxxx or something like that.
My point is you know damn well players were going to look at extremes to see how balanced things are. Hell I'm will to bet you guys did too. So why did you release a war dec over haul that makes the largest, richest null alliance also the safest in high sec??
It looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...
...your telling everyone it's not a duck?!
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1116
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 16:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
Is the first entity a defender allows to ally with him free?
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1116
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 16:18:00 -
[8] - Quote
Has those not involved in a war assisting those in combat via assist modules (remote repair, remote sensor boosting, etc) been addressed? As in not allowed?
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1116
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 16:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Is the first entity a defender allowed to ally with him free? Yeah it appears so - your FHC foreign legion alliance might still be on the cards.
Sounds good then. Well hold on, let me ask CCP if they will nerf that too...
CCP, Goons, TEST and the mighty CSM,
I would like to create an alliance for the purpose of letting those corps willing to fight the evil large null power blocks who think the new war dec system is a toy for them. Said alliance would not charge anything to ally with a defender. Such defenders that those large alliance war dec over some butt hurt post on the forums, different play style of the game or against someone who did not welcome having their online CV hacked and molested.
Mainly just to have fun. I hope fun is still ok.
Anyways, please let me know! Feel free to openly reply right here on the forums too. Considering the forums is where the real PvP happens.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1116
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 16:56:00 -
[10] - Quote
Hi Elise - Do you think after this change the war dec mechanic is perfect?
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |
|

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1116
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 17:31:00 -
[11] - Quote
Syndic Thrass wrote:Jade, the problem with all of your arguments is that you think of nothing but Goons this and Goons that. I have yet to see a post where you put more emphasis on mercs and high-sec wars than you put on "STOP THE GOONIES FROM BLOBBING EVERYONE". Maybe just repost your idea without all the anti-Goon sentiment and it will more than likely be received much better.
Also stop with the tinfoil hat bullshit. It has been done multiple times in this thread, but you as well as others just ignore them and focus on Jade's posts. Lallente has been making very good posts in regards to the war dec mechanic. Why don't you go toe-to-toe with him. I would very much like to see that.
Unless of course you are not ready for that.
/popcorn
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1119
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 18:30:00 -
[12] - Quote
Should the war dec fee take into account the actual 'real' member count who actually visit/live in high sec?
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1119
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 20:37:00 -
[13] - Quote
You know to be honest; it really feels like the war dec mechanic could be tweaked to revive the merc market and not provide a situation where mega alliances are all but immune to war decs in high sec from aggressors. Yet CCP and the CSM happily present the 1.1 patch and the open end to abuse it by large alliances as collateral damage with no intention of taking an honest look at it.
Any other ideas that not only maintain the idea of a dynamic merc marketplace, but improves upon it are promptly dismissed because it also includes a fix to keep super large alliances in the danger zone. Why are you determined to keep super large alliances as safe as possible while in high sec??
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1119
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 21:31:00 -
[14] - Quote
One more thing. You say access to 9000 targets in a war should have a high cost. Ok. The war dec mechanic is only relevant in high sec and maybe lolowsec if you really want to reach for things. Yet, to their own admission, only 1% actually go to high sec. Ok. So to have access to those 90 pilots you have to pay over 500 million ISK? But those 90 can war dec a corp/alliance of 150 for only 50 million ISK??
In one post you justify access to 9000, which is only on the extreme case all 9000 actually go to high sec. But then shortly after brush aside any posts describing extreme scenarios with words proclaiming you don't design game mechanics with extreme scenarios in mind.
What.
The.
****?!
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1119
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 22:16:00 -
[15] - Quote
Alain Kinsella wrote:@ Marlona Sky - Looks like you're (or at least a group of FHC folks are) doing this already at the merc level, which sounds intriguing and cool. We will see. Keep in mind this alliance will not be exclusive to just FHC, but to everyone. Also it will be targeting whatever the largest alliance in the game hiding behind the Inferno war dec mechanic.
CCP introduced a new war dec mechanic that just so happens to protect large bloated alliances. Someone (just happens to be Jade - get over it) finds a way to fight back. Days later CCP announce a change that just so happens to add another layer of protection for the large bloated alliances. If CCP make another change to add a third layer of protection for them...
Well it will be crystal clear what the agenda is.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1119
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 22:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
Two Step - Then push for some changes that revitalize the merc market without tossing a safety blanket over the large alliances. Can you do that??
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1120
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 23:13:00 -
[17] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:I'm reading the same post over and over and over again while trying to find some issues people are having with Inferno 1.1 it's a bit tiring  here, have this
So hats are coming out for us in the 1.1 patch?
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1121
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 23:26:00 -
[18] - Quote
Seleene - feel free to answer the same question I gave Two Step.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1122
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 23:45:00 -
[19] - Quote
Just stop it guys. EVE is not meant to be balanced. It is meant to be cold and harsh...
Well unless people start fighting large alliances and causing damage, then that needs to be fixed, then it's back to the cold dark universe...
Well unless people fly one specific super capital in large numbers, then obviously that needs to be fixed, then back to the unfair galaxy that is eve...
Well, unless...
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1123
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 00:37:00 -
[20] - Quote
XavierVE wrote:Quote:CCP Soundwave wrote:
Why would I want to balance a fight? That's never really been the goal in EVE and the war dec system wasn't built for that either. Because it's good game design. In fact, the way war decs were designed with Inferno was absolutely in keeping with the spirit of the sandbox. Allowing entities to rise up and defend other entities, should they wish to. Only problem was, that goofball Jade found a way to use the sandbox to grief Goons, something that is certainly not allowed, especially with devs who came into the game via Goonswarm to begin with being in charge of game mechanics. Favor the blob, everyone should be in 9000 man alliances! Stupid. I'd say you should just spawn them a few t2 BPO's while you're at it, but honestly, that's less egregious than changing the rules for the sole purpose of benefiting the largest entities in the game.
I like to troll, but the change was for the sole purpose of trying to fix the merc area. My issue is they turned a blind to it adding another layer of protection towards large alliances, in a way hurting the merc alliance. I want to know why they didn't bother to come up with a better solution. Acting like we can't have both is simply inexcusable.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |
|

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1125
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:24:00 -
[21] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Well unless people fly one specific super capital in large numbers, then obviously that needs to be fixed, then back to the unfair galaxy that is eve... I thought you were for the supercapital nerf
I was, for the sake of balance.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1125
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:28:00 -
[22] - Quote
Elecktra Blue wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:michael boltonIII wrote:Jade have you ever thought that if you are making enemies out of 5000 man alliances, then it would logically be reasonable that in order to fight them maybe you should be good enough at making friends to have another large alliance ally you. I've got 36 allied corps and alliances ready to go. If CCP don't nerf the alliance system by this time next year it'd be 300. You guys are the ones who want to stop my space-friends from being part of the war. You've got 36 groups of people that would of jumped on the war regardless if it was against you, or if we had declared war on the flying unicorn corp/alliance, the fact of the matter is, we did not whine about these mechanics, we embraced it. Its high-time you did the same and get over it, you wanted war and you got it, and we plan on playing by whatever changes are put or left in place. Also, stop claiming victory when you are not even participating in the war.
Jade coming out on top in any shape or form of goons war decing SF really pisses you off doesn't it?
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1125
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 02:29:00 -
[23] - Quote
Nastrado wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:michael boltonIII wrote:Jade have you ever thought that if you are making enemies out of 5000 man alliances, then it would logically be reasonable that in order to fight them maybe you should be good enough at making friends to have another large alliance ally you. I've got 36 allied corps and alliances ready to go. If CCP don't nerf the alliance system by this time next year it'd be 300. You guys are the ones who want to stop my space-friends from being part of the war. How will you ever find time to post useless 10,000 word essays and run you rp "business". You barley log on as it is.
Confirming logging in is a requirement to playing EVE. Also mittens would like to have a word with you.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1130
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 07:44:00 -
[24] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Inferno wardec system was meant to counter this by giving highsec communities a respite from being wardec-spammed but the attempt got hijacked by mental invalids who complained that "goonswarm is protected now" despite the fact Goonswarm's home region has zero CONCORD protection and they do all their logistics through alt corps anyway as an adaptation after years of managing highsec supply chains under the old, non-scaling wardec system.
fas-+ci-+nat-+ing
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1131
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 08:26:00 -
[25] - Quote
Klann Schreck wrote:Let me tell you about the repair systems skill or energy pulse weapons skill. This isnt a negative effect, it lets the RAH adjust to incoming damage quicker. thats a positive.
This thread needs one of those bad. 
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1133
|
Posted - 2012.06.13 16:00:00 -
[26] - Quote
I just find it silly it cost 500 million ISK to war dec 90 dudes.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |
|
|
|